Wednesday, 18 May 2016


i think posting on forums is quite dangerous
it certainly enables them to determine the threat you pose
i suggest posting on forums like where you can post anonymously ie without registering.
i suggest you browse such forums at home or wherever but only post from a computer/phone which is not yours ie go to a cybercafe - while there do NOT login to any accounts eg email / Facebook etc where your d├ętails are known


Sunday, 17 April 2016

i have also been posting under name

bob uk cant remember the number


Saturday, 6 February 2016


these posts made today here:

Turkey to Provoke Russia into WW3?



 I'm afraid I have to make a comment about the Russian leadership.

As far as i can see theyve made a huge mistake in not sending ground troops into Syria with the air campaign.

They could have dealt a very swift and harsh blow to ISIS and the whole thing would probably be over by now.

Yes, the West would have grumbled, but it would have been legal and thats all that matters.

Instead what could have been done in 3 - 4 months is only half completed and this has given the Satanists who control much of the planet time to formulate a new plan as we can now see.

And actually this air operation is, i suspect costing a lot more than necessary as much of this neutralisation of ISIS could be done by ground troops at a fraction of the cost.

So, all in all I have to say it appears to me the decision not to send in ground troops was a huge mistake because had they been there there's no way Turkey and S. Arabia would be contemplating a ground invasion - so youve opened that option up for them too. If Russia doesnt fill up this void, they will.

Now your only option is to declare, as you did yesterday, that a Turkey/S. Arabia ground invasion would be an act of war. So, youve backed yourself into a corner where your only option is the final option rather than leaving yourself with room to maneuver - not a smart move.

I have noticed some timidity on the part of the Russian leadership on a number of occasions and I think you need to be more bold.
ISIS could and should have been knocked out with one very swift and powerful blow. Instead they are still alive and kicking - I'd say that was a huge mistake.

Actually, I was a bit surprised from the start that Russia didnt send ground troops, but I just assumed they knew what they were doing.

I can only say I feel people who ought to be thinking clearly, aren't. This is not the time for laziness. - This last comment is not directed at Russia although I do wonder if they always think through all the options. It was more directed at Iran who IMO handled the post-al Nimr situation last month with a worrying lack of insight causing a massive Own Goal allowing the Satanists a huge propaganda coup against us by attacking the Saudi diplomatic buildings in Iran.



 re my last post, which has been edited btw,

I would also say that I think Russia should send ground troops into Syria immediately otherwise I fear we (the 6+ billion people who will fight to see this 'monolithic ruthless conspiracy' (JF Kennedy) defeated) may see the possibility of a really significant step forward ie the defeat of ISIS, evaporate before our eyes.

Infact I may go so far as to say you should either do this or nothing because doing it in a half-hearted way (which is what I think this is) could infact make the situation even more unstable.



 I would also urge people with military experience to offer advice to Vladimir Putin. I have studied him closely and my opinion is he is not a natural leader. Of course we are all delighted that finally there is someone willing to make a stand and for that reason we all support him whole-heartedly but deep down my opinion is it doesn't come naturally to him and I have seen this a number of times.

I know Russia has been through the most appalling episode (1917 - 1989) and in many ways is still struggling to really find its feet again, so none of this should be seen as an attack but rather as constructive criticism.



 We are all on the same team- there are only 2 sides in this battle: the 6+ billion ordinary sensible people who are generous and want to live in peace and those who would destroy us in their deluded quest for ultimate power. So, Russia and Mr. Putin, we are all on your side.

When I appeal for military advice, I don't mean every retired soldier on the planet phoning up with their suggestions, I really am appealing to senior and very senior officers ie Generals etc.

We all want Mr Putin to succeed and we will all do everything in our power to help him and those who ally with him. You must please see everything I've said as an attempt to be helpful.

I know everyone in Russia is working flat out to do their part in difficult circumstances and we praise and support you in that.

Also do not take my lack of posting for a while as a sign that I'm withdrawing. If ever I do decide to withdraw I will inform people, but its highly unlikely.

Wednesday, 6 January 2016

Further to my post yesterday re Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr - What Iran Should Do Now.

Actually the really intelligent thing for Iran to do now would be to apologise to Saudi Arabia for the damage to its buildings, offer to pay for the repairs and reverse any measures taken against Saudi Arabia following the execution of Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr.

This would show Iran to be above petty squabbling and mud-slinging - something we should all observe during these times.

People must understand that breaking the law in this way only helps The Satanists who control much of the planet and whom we are trying to either reform or remove.

These attacks have been a distraction from the condemnation that Saudi Arabia rightly deserves for this most outrageous of behaviour.

They have done us nothing but harm.

Remember in The Bible it says: When asked what one should do if one is hit upon the face, Jesus replies: "You should offer the other cheek."

It is not always best to respond to violence with violence. Sometimes it is more powerful to "offer the other cheek" .  We must avoid handing our enemies a propaganda victory.

Please make sure you understand this.

Remember also, Islam considers Jesus to be one of their prophets so its highly unlikely there is any inherent animosity between Christianity and Islam.

The animosity comes from Western nations (under control of the Satanic elite) attacking them whenever possible - but again, remember: turning the other cheek is often more powerful than treating like with like.

We must understand that the people we are trying to reform do not want to be reformed - they want to carry on as they are. They are always trying to lure us into traps.

As St Paul says: "You must be wise as serpents and harmless as doves".

This is the weapon we have to use - the one of transparency. It must be abundantly clear that it is not us who are the aggressors or those seeking to cause pain.

And, to be frank, the Iranian Government should have seen this coming and been ready to prevent any stupid behaviour. It's not that the anger is not justified, it is, but anything that weakens us is ridiculous.

Tuesday, 5 January 2016

Photos of Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr

View post on

 other photos of Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr not loaded due to crashing:

I must condemn the violence against Saudi buildings in Iran after the execution of Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr.

I must condemn the violence against Saudi buildings in Iran after the execution of Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr. Not because I support Saudi Arabia or its policies but because this hands the Satanists who control much of the planet exactly what they want namely an excuse to label us as violent and irrational.

Actually I dont think Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr would have approved of violence. He was a man of peace. This is why they feared him so much. They cannot deal with intelligent debate and disapproval. They CAN deal with violence - infact it is exactly what they want - it justifies the very crackdown and demonisation of us that they are trying to impose.

If we are better then we must show it by intelligent actions and NOT hand them exactly what they want. Sometimes "turning the other cheek" is our best weapon for it is then that they are seen for who they really are. Please make sure you understand this message. Thank you.


Another thing I must say is beware of false flags. TPTB use them all the time - not just in major bombings etc but also in low-level agitation - muggings, robbery, rape etc etc.
I have spent a lot of time amongst Muslims, Arabs, Africans and Asians and I do not recognise much of the bad behaviour reportedly carried out by them.

Almost to a man, I find them unfailingly decent, kind, humble, generous and caring. I am very willing to accept anything portraying them as otherwise is propaganda by the Satanists who control much of the planet and are behind 99.9999999% of the suffering in the world.

"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous, he cannot believe it exists." J Edgar Hoover, Director of the FBI for many years.

Be on your guard for the Satanists and their tricks. Go spend some time amongst the Muslims, Arabs, Africans and Asians and tell me I am wrong - please.

Sunday, 27 December 2015

Many Nations Admit to using False Flag Terrorism

Nations All Over the World CONFESS to Carrying Out False Flag Terrorism

Not Theory … Admitted Fact

There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.
In the following 54 instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admit to it, either orally or in writing:
(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.
(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.
(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.
(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely blamed it on the Nazis.
(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).
(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).
(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.
(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.
(11-21) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.
False flag attacks carried out pursuant tho this program include – by way of example only (and depending on how you count them):
(11) the murder of the Turkish Prime Minister (1960)
(12) bombings in Portugal (1966)
(13) the Piazza Fontana massacre in Italy (1969)
(14) terror attacks in Turkey (1971)
(15) the Peteano bombing in Italy (1972)
(16) shootings in Brescia, Italy and a bombing on an Italian train (1974)
(17) shootings in Istanbul, Turkey (1977)
(18) the Atocha massacre in Madrid, Spain (1977)
(19) the abduction and murder of the Italian Prime Minister (1978)
(20) the bombing of the Bologna railway station in Italy (1980)
(21) shooting and killing 28 shoppers in Brabant county, Belgium (1985)
(22) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.
(23) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.
(24) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
(25) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.
(26) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”
(27) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.
(28) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.
(29) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.
(30) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.
(31) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.
(32) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.
(33) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).
(34) The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces – updated in 2004 – recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars“. And see this.
(35) Similarly, a CIA “psychological operations” manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a “martyr” for the cause.  The manual was authenticated by the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that – during the 1984 presidential debate – President Reagan was confronted with the following question on national television:
At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs.
(36) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.
(37) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).
(38) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.
(39) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.
(40) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.
(41) Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that – in July 2001, at the G8 summit in Genoa – planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.
(42) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government.).

(43) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.
(44) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
(45) United Press International reported in June 2005:
U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
(46) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.
(47) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).
(48) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.
(49) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.
(50) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.
(51) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.
(52) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.
(53) The Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others. Ukrainian officials admit that the Ukrainian snipers fired on both sides, to create maximum chaos.
(54) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

So Common … There’s a Name for It

The use of the bully’s trick is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago.
“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.
The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.
Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks. Specifically, the rules of engagement state that a military force can fly the enemy’s flag, imitate their markings, or dress in an enemy’s clothes … but that the ruse has to be discarded before attacking.
Why are the rules of engagement so specific? Obviously, because nations have been using false flag attacks for many centuries.  And the rules of engagement are at least trying to limit false flag attacks so that they aren’t used as a false justification for war.
In other words, the rules of engagement themselves are an admission that false flag terrorism is a very common practice.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:
“A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! “In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin